TRABECULECTOMY VERSUS TUBE OUTCOME IN NEOVASCULAR GLAUCOMA

Daisy Syakhsiatusy Syahiqoh (1) , Fifin L. Rahmi (2) , Denti Puspasari (3) , Maharani (4)
(1) Resident of Ophthalmology Department of Diponegoro University, Kariadi Hospital, Semarang, Central Java , Indonesia
(2) Glaucoma Staff, Ophthalmology Department of Diponegoro University, Kariadi Hospital, Semarang, Central Java , Indonesia
(3) Glaucoma Staff, Ophthalmology Department of Diponegoro University, Kariadi Hospital, Semarang, Central Java , Indonesia
(4) Glaucoma Staff, Ophthalmology Department of Diponegoro University, Kariadi Hospital, Semarang, Central Java , Indonesia

Abstract

Introduction: Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is known to be a refractory form of glaucoma, which frequently requires the integrated use of medical, laser and incisional surgery. Tube-shunt implantation and trabeculectomy with anti-fibrotic agent are the two most-popular incisional procedures for managing refractory glaucoma. This study aims to compare surgical outcome between patients who underwent trabeculectomy versus tube-shunt implantation for the treatment of NVG.


 


Methods: A retrospective study was held of NVG patients that underwent trabeculectomy and tube-shunt implantation between January 2020 - December 2022 at Dr. Kariadi Hospital, Semarang. IOP outcome and success rate was measured at 3 months post operatively. Statistical analysis was used to compare the outcome between groups, p<0.05 was considered significant.


 


Result: There were no significant differences in characteristics between groups at baseline. Mean IOP measured at 3 months postoperatively was 18.58 ± 5.53 and 15.94 ± 10.79 in trabeculectomy and tube group respectively (p=0.04), complete success rate was 18.8% in trabeculectomy and 25% in tube group, qualified success rate was 37.5% in trabeculectomy and 56.3% in tube group. Greater failure rate was observed in trabeculectomy group (43.8%).


 


Conclusion: Compared to trabeculectomy, tube-shunt implantation has lower IOP at 3 months postoperatively in NVG. Similar number of anti-glaucoma medications was needed postoperatively in both procedure. Greater qualified success rate was achieved in tube-shunt implantation. Greater failure rate was observed in trabeculectomy.


 

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Urbonaviciute D, Buteikiene D, Januleviciene I. A Review of Neovascular Glaucoma: Etiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Medicina 2022;58(1870):1-14.

Senthil S, Dada T, Das T, et al. Neovascular glaucoma - A review. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2021;69(3):525-534.

Senthil S, Chary R, Ali MH, et al. Trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma in proliferative diabetic retinopathy, central retinal vein occlusion, and ocular ischemic syndrome: Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors for failure. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2021;69(11):3341-3348.

Tokumo K, Komatsu K, Yuasa Y, et al. Treatment outcomes in the neovascular glaucoma tube versus trabeculectomy study. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2021;259(10):3067-3076.

Shen CC, Salim S, Du H, Netland PA. Trabeculectomy versus Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation in neovascular glaucoma. Clinical Ophthalmology 2011;5:281–286.

Liu L, Xu Y, Huang Z, Wang X. Intravitreal ranibizumab injection combined trabeculectomy versus Ahmed valve surgery in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma: assessment of efficacy and complications. BMC Ophthalmology 2016;16(1):65.

Im Y-W, Lym H-S, Park C-K, Moon J-I. Comparison of Mitomycin C Trabeculectomy and Ahmed Valve Implant Surgery for Neovascular Glaucoma. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2004;45(9):1515-1521.

Hyung SM, Kim SK. Midd-term effects of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in neovascular glaucoma patients. Korean J Ophthalmol 2001;15(2):98-106.

Takihara Y, Inatani M, Fukushima M, Iwao K, Iwao M, Tanihara H. Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C for Neovascular Glaucoma: Prognostic Factors for Surgical Failure. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;147(5):912-918.e1.

Higashide T, Ohkubo S, Sugiyama K. Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Trabeculectomy following Intraocular Bevacizumab Injection for Neovascular Glaucoma. PLOS ONE 2015;10(8):e0135766.

Al Obeidan S, Osman E, Al-Amro S, Kangave D, Abu El-Asrar A. Full preoperative panretinal photocoagulation improves the outcome of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for neovascular glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2008;18(5):758-764.

Kiuchi Y, Sugimoto R, Nakae K, Saito Y, Ito S. Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C for Treatment of Neovascular Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients. Ophthalmologica 2006;220(6):383-388.

Mandal A, Majji A, Mandal S, et al. Mitomycin-C-augmented trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma. A preliminary report. Indian J Ophthalmol 2002;50:287-93.

Yalvac IS, Eksioglu U, Satana B, Duman S. Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve and Molteno implant in neovascular glaucoma. Eye 2007;21(1):65-70.

Iwasaki K, Kojima S, Wajima R, et al. Comparing Surgical Outcomes in Neovascular Glaucoma between Tube and Trabeculectomy: A Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology Glaucoma 2022;5(6):672-680.

Authors

Daisy Syakhsiatusy Syahiqoh
daisy.syahiqoh@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Fifin L. Rahmi
Denti Puspasari
Maharani
Syahiqoh, D. S., Rahmi, F. L., Denti Puspasari, & Maharani. (2024). TRABECULECTOMY VERSUS TUBE OUTCOME IN NEOVASCULAR GLAUCOMA. Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(S1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.35749/n4njgr60

Article Details

How to Cite

Syahiqoh, D. S., Rahmi, F. L., Denti Puspasari, & Maharani. (2024). TRABECULECTOMY VERSUS TUBE OUTCOME IN NEOVASCULAR GLAUCOMA. Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(S1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.35749/n4njgr60

Management of Uveitic Glaucoma in Children with Blau Syndrome

Ivone Caroline, Elsa Gustianty, Andika Prahasta, R. Maula Rifada
Abstract View : 157
Download :212