Severity of Amblyopia and Its Correlation with The Amount of Refractive Error
Abstract
Background: To analyze the correlation between the severity of amblyopia and the amount of refractive error
Methods: Patients in outpatient clinic dr Soetomo General Hospital, who was diagnozed as amblyopia, from November 2011 – January 2013, were enrolled in this retrospective study. All subjects were evaluated for subjective refraction using Snellen Chart and objective refraction using streak retinoscopy. The severity of amblyopia determined by the BCVA and the amount of refractive error stated by the spherical equivalent and the amount of cylindrical errors.
Result: The subjects of this study was 40 patients (73 eyes) with age 5-11 years old. The range of BCVA was 0,1-0,8 logMAR units, the spherical equivalent of refractive errors were minus 1,5D – 12,75D and the cylindrical errors were minus 0,50 – 5,00D. Statistically, there was correlation between the severity of amblyopia and the spherical equivalent of refractive errors, but there was no correlation with the cylindrical errors.
Conclusion: The severity of amblyopia has a correlation with the amount of spherical equivalent of refractive error, but has no correlation with the amount of astigmatism.
Â
Key words: Amblyopia, Spherical Equivalent, Cylindrical Error
Full text article
References
Dobson V, Miller JM, Clifford Donaldson CE, Harvey EM. 2008. Associations between Anisometropia, Amblyopia, and Reduced Stereoacuity in a School-Aged Population with a High Prevalence of Astigmatism. Investigative of Ophthalmology & Visual science. Vol 49 (10) : 4427-4436
Goss DA, Grosvenor TP, Keller JT, Marsh-Tootle W, Norton, TT, Zadnik K. 1997. Optometric Clinical Practival Guideline Care of The Patient with Myopia. American Optometric Association, St Louis.
Gunawan W. 2012. Ambliopia Patofisiologi dan Penegakan Diagnosis. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.3-21.
Ingram RM. 1977. Refraction as basic screening children for squint and amblyopia. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 61, 8-15
Levartovsky S, Oliver M, Gottesman N, Shimshoni M. 1995. Factors Affecting Long Term Results of Succesfully treated Amblyopia: Initial Visual Acuity and Type of Amblyopia. 
British Journal of Ophthalmology. 79:225-228
Raab EL, Aaby AA, Blomm JN, Edmond JC, Lueder GT, Olitsky SE, Phillips PH, Nischal KK, Wiggins RE. 2011. Amblyopia. In Pediatric Ophthalmology. BasicClinical Science Course Chapter 6. American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Rouse MW, Cooper JS, Cotter SA, Press LJ, Tannen BM. 1994.. Guidelines Care of the Patient with Amblyopia. American Optometric Association. St Louis
Von Noorden GK. 1974. Factors involved in the production of Amblyopia. Brit. J. Ophthal. (I 974) 58, 158
Yip WK, Fan DSP. 2007. Amblyopia: An overview. Hongkong Medical Diary. Vol 12 no 9