Surgery Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma Patients at Sardjito General Hospital Oral Presentation - Observational Study - Resident

Yuandani Saputra (1) , Krisna Dwi Purnomo Jati (2) , Retno Ekantini (3) , Tatang T Gani (4)
(1) , Indonesia
(2) , Indonesia
(3) , Indonesia
(4) , Indonesia

Abstract

Introduction & Objectives
Glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation was an effective surgical procedure in treating
uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) of glaucoma patients in certain complicated conditions. GDD
implants were classified into valved and non-valved in which its surgical outcomes in different types
of device and various etiologies were not similar. This study aimed to evaluate the surgery outcomes
of GDD implantation in patients with refractory glaucoma at Sardjito General Hospital.



Methods
All 12 eyes of 11 patient’s medical records who underwent GDD implantation during 2022 at Sardjito
General Hospital was reviewed. Baseline data include age, gender, eye laterality, type of glaucoma,
IOP and visual acuity. The IOP and visual acuity (LogMAR) were measured at week 1, month 1, 2
and 3. Type of GDD implants, postoperative glaucoma medications, complications and need for
further glaucoma surgery were documented.



Results
The mean IOP at baseline was 44 ± 14.2 mmHg with 3.4 ± 0.6 glaucoma medications. It decreased
after surgery into 19.1 ± 11.2 mmHg (p=0.003) at 3 months follow up with 0.7 ± 1.7 (p=0.002)
glaucoma medications. The mean initial visual acuity was 1.9 ± 0.6 and changed insignificantly to
1.7 ± 0.8 (p=0.624) at last follow up. Six eyes (50%) were implanted with valved implant. The most
common early postoperative complications were recurrent high IOP (4 eyes, 33.3%) associated to
ripcord of non-valved implant (p=0.025). Five eyes (41.7%) needed additional surgery related to
non-valved implant type (p=0.003).



Conclusion
GDD implantation especially valved type appears to be safe and effective surgical option in treating
refractory glaucoma patients.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

ThamYC,LiX,WongTY,QuigleyHA,AungT, ChengCY.Global prevalenceofglaucomaand projectionsofglaucomaburdenthrough2040:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014Nov;121(11):2081-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.Epub2014Jun26. PMID:24974815.

CookC, FosterP.Epidemiologyof glaucoma: what'snew?CanJOphthalmol.2012;47(3):223-6. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.02.003.PMID:22687296.

BudijantoD,KurniawanR,WidiantiniW,SaktiES, HabibiH.SituasiGlaukomadiIndonesia.Infodatin. PusatDatadanInformasiKementerianKesehatan RI.2019.ISSN2442-7659

DasJC,ChaudhuriZ,SharmaP,BhomajS.The Ahmedglaucomavalve inrefractoryglaucoma: experienceinIndianeyes.Eye2005;19:183–190.

Purtskhvanidze,K.,Saeger,M.,Treumer,F. et al.Long-termresultsofglaucomadrainagedevice surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019; 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1027-z

SouzaC,TranDH,LomanJ,et.al.LongTerm OutcomesofAhmedGlaucomaValveImplantation in Refractory Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:893–900.ElsevierInc.

SchwartzKS, LeeRK,GeddeSJ.Glaucoma drainageimplants:acriticalcomparisonof types. CurrOpinOphthalmol.2006Apr;17(2):181-9.doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000193080.55240.7e. PMID: 16552254.

Rojananuangnit K, Jiaranaisilawong P, RattanaphaithunO,SathimW.SurgicalOutcomes of GlaucomaDrainageDevice Implantation in RefractoryGlaucomaPatients inThailand.Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec 14;16:4163-4178. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S393730.PMID:36540897;PMCID: PMC9760067.

LeeCK,MaKT,HongYJ,KimCY.Long-term clinicaloutcomesofAhmedvalveimplantationin patientswith refractory glaucoma. PLoSOne. 2017;12(11):e0187533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187533

ChooJQH,ChenZD,KohV,LiangS,AquinoCM, SngC,ChewP.OutcomesandComplicationsof Ahmed Tube Implantation in Asian Eyes. J Glaucoma. 2018 Aug;27(8):733-738. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001004.PMID:29916997.

ReswariWA,WardhaniS,JatiKDP,ArsiantiE, GaniTT,EkantiniR.OutcomesandComplications ofAhmedGlaucomaValveImplantationatDr.Yap Eye Hospital. Ophthalmologica Indonesiana. 2019;45(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.35749/journal. v45i2.188

Authors

Yuandani Saputra
Krisna Dwi Purnomo Jati
Retno Ekantini
Tatang T Gani
Saputra, Y. ., Jati, K. D. P., Ekantini, R., & Gani, T. T. (2024). Surgery Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma Patients at Sardjito General Hospital: Oral Presentation - Observational Study - Resident. Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(S2). https://doi.org/10.35749/2fz26x42

Article Details

How to Cite

Saputra, Y. ., Jati, K. D. P., Ekantini, R., & Gani, T. T. (2024). Surgery Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma Patients at Sardjito General Hospital: Oral Presentation - Observational Study - Resident. Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(S2). https://doi.org/10.35749/2fz26x42

Outcomes and Complication of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation at Dr.Yap Eye Hospital

Widya Ardhana Reswari, Retno Ekantini, Sri Wardhani, Krisna Dwi Purnomo Jati, Tatang Talka Gani,...
Abstract View : 0

Outcomes and Complications of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation at Dr. Yap Eye Hospital

Widya A Reswari, Sri Wardhani, Krisna D P Jati, Erin Arsianti, Tatang Talka Gani, Retno Ekantini
Abstract View : 386
Download :111