MONOVISION VERSUS MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION IN CATARACT PATIENTS:A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Fadhli Waznan (1) , Yosilia Nursakina (2) , Aydan J. Rancakbudi (3) , Syska Widyawati (4)
(1) RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta, Indonesia , Indonesia
(2) School of Public Health, Imperial College London, SW7 2BX London, UK , Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia , Indonesia
(4) RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta, Indonesia , Indonesia

Abstract

Objective: With the aim to increase spectacle independence, recent approaches to repair cataracts include the implantation of premium intraocular lenses (IOLs), such as multifocals. Another approach is monovision techniques achieved by monofocal IOL implantation, which is more cost-effective, although it has the same good outcome as multifocal IOLs. This meta-analysis aimed to compare monovision versus multifocal IOL implantation in cataract patients.


Method: Systematic search was performed in April 2023 on six databases (Medline, SCOPUS, Proquest, EBSCO, Embase, and PubMed). Studies were extracted for the following outcome of interest: monovision, multifocal intraocular lens, spectacles independence, visual acuity. All studies published up to April 2023 were reviewed. Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) and The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to screen studies for risk of bias where appropriate. A meta-analysis was done to quantify any reported quantitative data.


Result: Ten studies satisfying the inclusion criteria were included. Pooling analysis for BCVA and BNVA showed no difference between monovision vs multifocal IOL (95% CI at -0,10 to 0,73; I2=79% (p=0,14) and 95% CI at -0,27 to 1,37; I2=94% (p=0,19), respectively). Spectacle independence showed monovision was inferior to multifocal IOL (RR 0,53; 95% CI at 0,34 to 0,82; I² 83% (p=0,004)).


Conclusion: Current evidence showed monovision was comparable to multifocal IOL in terms of visual acuity. While multifocal IOL achieved more spectacle-free patients than monovision, many patients in the monovision group also achieved spectacle-free condition.


Keywords: cataract, monovision, multifocal intraocular lens, visual acuity, spectacle independence.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) results [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 May 13]. Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool

Shu Y, Shao Y, Zhou Q, Lu L, Wang Z, Zhang L, et al. Changing Trends in the Disease Burden of Cataract and Forecasted Trends in China and Globally from 1990 to 2030. Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2023 May;Volume 15:525–34. Available from: https://www.dovepress.com/changing-trends-in-the-disease-burden-of-cataract-and-forecasted-trend-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CLEP

Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli M V, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Heal [Internet]. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221–34. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214109X17303935

Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli M V, Das A, Jonas JB, et al. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Heal [Internet]. 2017 Sep;5(9):e888–97. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214109X17302930

Chang JSM, Chen IN, Chan WM, Ng JCM, Chan VKC, Law AKP. Initial evaluation of a femtosecond laser system in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2014 Jan;40(1):29–36. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/02158034-201401000-00006

Labiris G, Gatzioufas Z, Giarmoukakis A, Sideroudi H, Kozobolis V. Liquefaction versus torsional IP: a comparative study on endothelial cells, corneal edema and corneal sensitivity. Ophthalmic Res. 2013;49:37–42.

Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, Collins M. Visual function and spectacle independence after cataract surgery: Bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2011 May;37(5):853–8. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/02158034-201105000-00010

Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Puchades C, Montés-Micó R. Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2010 May;36(5):733–9. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/02158034-201005000-00005

Barisic A, Dekaris I, Gabric N, Bohac M, Romac I, Mravicic I, et al. Comparison of diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses in presbyopia treatment. Coll Antropol [Internet]. 2008;32(2):27–31. Available from: http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/54732

de Vries NE, Webers CAB, Touwslager WRH, Bauer NJC, de Brabander J, Berendschot TT, et al. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2011 May;37(5):859–65. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/02158034-201105000-00011

Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Patsiamanidi M, Papadopoulos Z, Kozobolis VP. Mini-monovision versus multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2015 Jan;41(1):53–7. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/02158034-201501000-00010

Ito M, Shimizu K, Amano R, Handa T. Assessment of visual performance in pseudophakic monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2009 Apr;35(4):710–4. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/02158034-200904000-00030

de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, Ziaei M, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2016 Dec 12;2016(12). Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4

Maxwell WA, Waycaster CR, D’Souza AO, Meissner BL, Hileman K. A United States cost–benefit comparison of an apodized, diffractive, presbyopia-correcting, multifocal intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2008 Nov;34(11):1855–61. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/02158034-200811000-00019

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savovi? J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ [Internet]. 2016 Oct 12;i4919. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.i4919

Sterne J, Savovi? J, Page M, Elbers R, Blencowe N, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:I4898.

Wilkins MR, Allan BD, Rubin GS, Findl O, Hollick EJ, Bunce C, et al. Randomized Trial of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses versus Monovision after Bilateral Cataract Surgery. Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2013 Dec;120(12):2449-2455.e1. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016164201300688X

Labiris G, Panagiotopoulou EK, Perente A, Ntonti P, Delibasis K, Fotiadis I, et al. Premium Monovision versus Bilateral Myopic Monovision, Hybrid Monovision and Bilateral Trifocal Implantation: A Comparative Study. Clin Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2022 Mar;Volume 16:619–29. Available from: https://www.dovepress.com/premium-monovision-versus-bilateral-myopic-monovision-hybrid-monovisio-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH

Chen M, Atebara NH, Chen TT. A Comparison of a Monofocal Acrysoft IOL Using the “Blended Monovision” Formula with the Multifocal Array IOL for Glasses Independence After Cataract Surgery. Ann Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2007 Oct 22;39(3):237–40. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12009-007-0035-4

Chen M. A study of monofocal intraocular lens (AcrySof®) in mini-monovision (MMV) and premium multifocal implantation of ReSTOR®. Clin Optom [Internet]. 2010 Dec;2:1–3. Available from: http://www.dovepress.com/a-study-of-monofocal-intraocular-lens-acrysof-reg-in-mini-monovision-m-peer-reviewed-article-OPTO

Rodov L, Reitblat O, Levy A, Assia EI, Kleinmann G. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction for Trifocal, Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses. J Refract Surg [Internet]. 2019 Jul;35(7):434–40. Available from: https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/1081597X-20190618-01

Stock RA, Thumé T, Paese LG, Bonamigo EL. Subjective evaluation of uncorrected vision in patients undergoing cataract surgery with (diffractive) multifocal lenses and monovision. Clin Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2017 Jul;Volume 11:1285–90. Available from: https://www.dovepress.com/subjective-evaluation-of-uncorrected-vision-in-patients-undergoing-cat-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH

Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, Collins M. Visual function and patient satisfaction: Comparison between bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2011 Mar;37(3):446–53. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/02158034-201103000-00005

Parede TRR, Torricelli AAM, Mukai A, Vieira Netto M, Bechara SJ. Quality of vision in refractive and cataract surgery, indirect measurers: review article. Arq Bras Oftalmol [Internet]. 2013 Dec;76(6):386–90. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492013000600016&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

Zhao G, Zhang J, Zhou Y, Hu L, Che C, Jiang N. Visual function after monocular implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal or single-piece monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2010 Feb;36(2):282–5. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/02158034-201002000-00018

JI J, HUANG X, FAN X, LUO M. Visual performance of Acrysof ReSTOR compared with a monofocal intraocular lens following implantation in cataract surgery. Exp Ther Med [Internet]. 2013 Jan;5(1):277–81. Available from: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/etm.2012.740

Palmer AM, Faina PG, Albelda AE, Serrano MC, Saad MD, Cespedes MC. Visual Function With Bilateral Implantation of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. J Refract Surg [Internet]. 2008 Jan;24(3):257–64. Available from: https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/1081597X-20080301-07

Chen T, Yu F, Lin H, Zhao Y, Chang P, Lin L, et al. Objective and subjective visual quality after implantation of all optic zone diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, case-control observational study. Br J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2016 Nov;100(11):1530–5. Available from: https://bjo.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307135

Authors

Fadhli Waznan
fwaznan@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Yosilia Nursakina
Aydan J. Rancakbudi
Syska Widyawati
Waznan, F., Nursakina, Y., Rancakbudi, A. J., & Widyawati, S. (2024). MONOVISION VERSUS MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION IN CATARACT PATIENTS:A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(S1), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.35749/g3sfee02

Article Details

How to Cite

Waznan, F., Nursakina, Y., Rancakbudi, A. J., & Widyawati, S. (2024). MONOVISION VERSUS MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION IN CATARACT PATIENTS:A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(S1), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.35749/g3sfee02

Outcomes and Complication of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation at Dr.Yap Eye Hospital

Widya Ardhana Reswari, Retno Ekantini, Sri Wardhani, Krisna Dwi Purnomo Jati, Tatang Talka Gani,...
Abstract View : 0

Outcomes and Complications of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation at Dr. Yap Eye Hospital

Widya A Reswari, Sri Wardhani, Krisna D P Jati, Erin Arsianti, Tatang Talka Gani, Retno Ekantini
Abstract View : 372
Download :100