Identifying the Burden of Digital Eye Strain: Prevalence, Clinical Manifestations, and Risk Factors in Indonesian Medical Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35749/oi.v52i1.101960Keywords:
Digital Eye Strain, prevalence, risk factor, medical students, digital device useAbstract
Introduction: The increasing use of digital devices among university students, particularly in medical education, has raised concerns regarding Digital Eye Strain (DES). This study aimed to assess the prevalence, symptom profile, and risk factors of DES among Indonesian medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 356 medical students using the validated Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q). Data on demographic characteristics, ocular history, digital device usage habits, and DES symptoms were collected. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with DES, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: The prevalence of DES was 62.9%. Common symptoms included itchy eyes (76.8%), blurred vision (70.1%), and headaches (76.33%). Bivariate analysis revealed associations between DES and refractive errors (OR 1.889, p = 0.004), poor posture (OR 0.467, p = 0.001), and the use of more than two digital devices daily (OR 1.610, p = 0.030). Multivariate analysis identified refractive errors (OR 2.049, 95% CI: 1.300–3.227, p = 0.002), poor posture (OR 0.413, 95% CI: 0.258–0.663, p < 0.001), and the use of more than two devices (OR 1.879, 95% CI: 1.171–3.015, p = 0.009) as independent risk factors for DES. Conclusion: DES is highly prevalent among Indonesian medical students. Refractive errors, poor posture, and the concurrent use of multiple digital devices were significant risk factors. Vision screening, ergonomic education, and digital health awareness are recommended to reduce DES and support ocular health.
Downloads
References
1. Rondonuwu VWK, Mewo YM, Wungow HIS. Pendidikan kedokteran di masa pandemi COVID-19 dampak pembelajaran daring bagi mahasiswa fakultas kedokteran angkatan 2017 Unsrat. J Biomed. 2021;13(1):67. doi: 10.35790/jbm.13.1.2021.31764.
2. Ronzhina N, et al. Digitalization of modern education: problems and solutions. Int J Emerging Technologies Learn. 2021;16(4):122-135. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i04.18203.
3. Sekarrini L. The impact of smartphone usage in adolescents 15-24 years old in jabodetabek Region. The Indonesian J Public Health. 2020;15(1):103. doi: 10.20473/ijph.v15i1.2020.103-111.
4. Gupta R, Chauhan L, Varshney A. Impact of e-schooling on digital eye strain in coronavirus disease era: a survey of 654 students. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2021;33(2):158-164. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_89_20.
5. AOA. Computer Vision Syndrome. Available at: https://www.aoa.org/healthy-eyes/eye-and-vision-conditions/computer-vision-syndrome?sso=y (Accessed: 5 January 2023).
6. Cantó-Sancho N, et al. Computer vision syndrome prevalence according to individual and video display terminal exposure characteristics in Spanish university students. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(3):1-8. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13681.
7. Munsamy AJ, et al. A case study of digital eye strain in a university student population during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown in South Africa: evidence of an emerging public health issue. J Public Health Africa. 2022;13(3):2103. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2022.2103.
8. Noreen K, et al. Prevalence of computer vision syndrome and its associated risk factors among under graduate medical students of urban Karachi. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2017;32(October 2016). Available at: http://pjo.org.pk/index.php/pjo/article/view/106.
9. Abudawood GA, Ashi HM, Almarzouki NK. Computer vision syndrome among undergraduate medical students in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J of Opthal. 2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/2789376 Research.
10. Mowatt L, et al. Computer vision syndrome and ergonomic practices among undergraduate university students. Int J Clin Pract. 2018;72(1). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13035.
11. Gammoh Y. Digital eye strain and its risk factors among a university student population in jordan: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2021;13(2):1-12. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13575.
12. Dessie A, et al. Computer vision syndrome and associated factors among computer users in Debre Tabor town, Northwest Ethiopia. J Environ Public Health. 2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/4107590.
13. Ferzana M, Somasundaran S, Poothatta J. Digital eye strain among undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey. Kerala J Ophthalmol. 2021;33(3):284-290. doi: 10.4130/kjo.kjo_168_20.
14. Alatawi SK, et al. Self-reported student awareness and prevalence of computer vision syndrome during covid-19 pandemic at Al-Baha University. Clin Optom. 2022;14(September):193-194. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S374837.
15. Huynh R. The role of e-learning in medical education build or buy? curricular design and external basic sciences learning resources effective collaboration on skin disease starts with medical education. Acad Med. 2017;92(4):2017.
16. Rochmayani DS, Cahyaningsih O.Validity of the eye health literacy measurement instrument for elementary school students, J Health Educ. 2021;25(1):57-60. doi: 10.1080/10556699.1994.10603001.
17. Nadhiva RF, Mulyono M. The relation between symptoms of computer vision syndrome and visual display terminal utilization. The Indonesian J Occup Safety Health. 2020;9(3):328. doi: 10.20473/ijosh.v9i3.2020.328-337.
18. Seguí MD, et al. A reliable and valid questionnaire was developed to measure computer vision syndrome at the workplace. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(6):662-673. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.015.
19. Usgaonkar U, Parkat SRS, Shetty A. Impact of the use of digital devices on eyes during the lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic Ugam. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;17(1):1. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO.
20. Guillon M, Maïssa C. Tear film evaporation-Effect of age and gender. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(4):171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2010.03.002.
21. Mohammed F, Somasundaran S, Poothatta J. Digital eye strain among undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey. Kerala J Ophthalmol. 2021;90(33):284-290. doi: 10.0.16.7/kjo.kjo_168_20.
22. Gowrisankaran S, Sheedy JE. Computer vision syndrome: A review. Work. 2015;52(2):303-314. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152162.
23. Iqbal M, et al. Visual sequelae of computer vision syndrome: A cross-sectional case-control study. J Ophthalmol. 2021. doi: 10.1155/2021/6630286.
24. Adane F, Alamneh YM, Desta M. Computer vision syndrome and predictors among computer users in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Health. 2022;50(1). doi: 10.1186/s41182-022-00418-3.
25. Das A, et al. Computer vision syndrome, musculoskeletal, and stress-related problems among visual display terminal users in Nepal. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(7):1-8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268356.
26. Dahshan D, Rosdahl JA. Digital eye strain during the virtual interviews: evidence-based strategies for medical students. Digit J Ophthalmol. 2022;28(5):22-25. doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2022.05.003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elwande Hagasaro Zega, Selly Azmeila, Yetty Machrina, Kamal Basri Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.