THE DIFFERENCE OF PREDICTED REFRACTION AND FINAL REFRACTION USING BARRETT II UNIVERSAL FORMULA AND SRK/T FORMULA IN HIGH MYOPIA PATIENTS AFTER PHACOEMULSIFICATION AND IOL IMPLANTATION AT DR. KARIADI GENERAL HOSPITAL SEMARANG

Riva Irlinda (1) , Fatimah Dyah Nur Astuti (2)
(1) , Indonesia
(2) , Indonesia

Abstract

Introduction and Objective


Studies have shown that 38% of refractive errors after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation are caused by deviations in calculation of IOL power using formulas. The difference between the formula’s refractive prediction and patient’s final outcome highly increases in cases of high myopia, but there needs to be more research on this topic. This study aims to show the difference between the predicted and final refractive outcomes using Barrett II Universal (BUII) formula and the SRK/T in patients with high myopia who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation.


Method


This analytical observational study with cross-sectional design was conducted on patients with high myopia (axial length ? 26.0 mm) who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation between January 2021 and January 2022 at Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Semarang. The data used in this study consisted of biometric measurements and the difference between the predicted refractive outcomes using the BU-II and SRK/T formulas and the final refractive outcomes of patients one month after the surgery. The data were analyzed using a one-sample T-test, and significance level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results


Thirty-five eyes participated in this study, and the mean axial length was (29.33 2.01). The BU-II formula has a mean difference in the refraction prediction, with the patient's final refraction result being closer to zero (1.191.31) than the SRK/T formula (1.25 1,12). The refractive prediction difference between the two formulas was statistically significant (p < 0.05).


Conclusion


The BU-II formula has a lower difference between predicted refractive outcomes and final refractive outcomes of high myopia patients after phacoemulsification and IOL implantation than the SRK/T formula.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–42.

World Health Organization. The impact of myopia and high myopia: Report of the Joint World Health Organization – Brien Holden Vision Institute Global Scientific Meeting on Myopia. World Health Organization. World Health Organization; 2017. 57 p.m.

Kang S Il, Moon K, Jun JH. Accuracy of Three Intraocular Lens-power Formulas in Predicting Refractive Outcomes in Different Intraocular Lenses. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2016;57:1891.

Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:169–178.

Doshi D, Limdi P, Parekh N, Gohil N. A comparative study to assess the predictability of different iol power calculation formulas in the eyes of short and long axial length. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11:NC01–NC04.

Xia T, Martinez CE, Tsai LM. Update on intraocular lens formulas and calculations. Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol. 2020;9:186–193.

Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(10):1490–1500.

Kane JX, Melles RB. Intraocular lens formula comparison in axial hyperopia with a high-power intraocular lens of 30 or more diopters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(9):1236–1239.

Wang JK, Hu CY, Chang SW. Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(2):262–7.

Zhang Y, Liang XY, Liu S, Lee JWY, Bhaskar S, Lam DSC. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power CalculationFormulas for Highly Myopic Eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:1917268.

Chen C, Xu X, Miao Y, Zheng G, Sun Y, Xu X. Accuracy of intraocular lens power formulas involving 148 Eyes with long axial lengths: A retrospective chart review study. J Ophthalmol. 2015;1–7.

Iijima K, Kamiya K, Iida Y, Shoji N. Comparison of Predictability Using Barrett Universal II and SRK/T Formulas according to Keratometry. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:7625725.

Abulafia A, Barrett GD, Rotenberg M, Kleinmann G, Levy A, Reitblat O, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: Comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(3):548556.

Chong EW, Mehta JS. High myopia and cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27:45–50.

Authors

Riva Irlinda
Fatimah Dyah Nur Astuti
Irlinda, R. ., & Astuti, F. D. N. . (2024). THE DIFFERENCE OF PREDICTED REFRACTION AND FINAL REFRACTION USING BARRETT II UNIVERSAL FORMULA AND SRK/T FORMULA IN HIGH MYOPIA PATIENTS AFTER PHACOEMULSIFICATION AND IOL IMPLANTATION AT DR. KARIADI GENERAL HOSPITAL SEMARANG . Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(S2). https://doi.org/10.35749/d5wwbq11

Article Details

How to Cite

Irlinda, R. ., & Astuti, F. D. N. . (2024). THE DIFFERENCE OF PREDICTED REFRACTION AND FINAL REFRACTION USING BARRETT II UNIVERSAL FORMULA AND SRK/T FORMULA IN HIGH MYOPIA PATIENTS AFTER PHACOEMULSIFICATION AND IOL IMPLANTATION AT DR. KARIADI GENERAL HOSPITAL SEMARANG . Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(S2). https://doi.org/10.35749/d5wwbq11

THE DIFFERENCE OF PREDICTED AND FINAL REFRACTION USING BU-II AND SRK/T FORMULA IN HIGH MYOPIA PATIENT AT DR. KARIADI HOSPITAL

Riva Irlinda, Fatimah Dyah Nur Astuti, A. Kentar Arimadyo Sulakso, Wisnu Sadasih, A. Rizal Fanany
Abstract View : 53
Download :32