THE METHODS OF ASSESSING VISUAL ACUITY IN CHILDREN IN COMMUNITY SETTING IN MALANG
Abstract
Introduction & Objectives
Early visual acuity assessment in children is crucial for conducting early intervention to improve
their literation quality. The examination in children often experiences difficulties, thus appropriate
approach and method are needed. The objective of this examination is to measure visual acuity in
children using four different methods.
Methods
This observational-descriptive study with cross-sectional design was established based on secondary
data collected through community service setting in two orphanages in Malang. This study included
children with an age range from 0.5 year-old to 12 year-old. All children underwent visual acuity
examination using Lea numbers, Lea symbols, Ivory Ball, and Mounted Ball.
Results
A total of 57 children underwent visual acuity examination. The mean age of subjects was 5.9 (SD
3.05) year-old. The caretaker of the orphanage had been informed and consented about the
examination and data analysis. Among those children, 26 (45.6%) were examined with Lea numbers,
19 (33.3%) children with Lea symbols, 6 (10.5%) children with Ivory Ball, and 6 (10.5%) children
with Mounted Ball. The examination results were 33 (57.9%) children who had normal visual acuity,
14 (24.6%) children with mild visual impairment, 7 (12.3%) children with moderate visual
impairment, 1 (1.8%) child with severe visual impairment, and 1 (1.8%) child considered blind.
Conclusion
Lea numbers, Lea symbols, Ivory Ball, and Mounted Ball could be used effectively to measure
children visual acuity in community setting.
Full text article
References
Lestari KD, Handayani TA, Dewiyani CI. Karakteristik Dan Perbedaan Kelainan Refraksi Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar Di Sekolah Dasar Cipta Dharma Denpasar. Februari 2014. Medicina (B Aires). Published Online 2019. Doi:10.15562/Medicina.V50i2.224.
Prayoga H, Budiono I, Widowati E. Hubungan Antara Intensitas Pencahayaan Dan Kelainan Refraksi Mata Dengan Kelelahan Mata Pada Tenaga Paramedis Di Bagian Rawat Inap RSUD Dr. Soediran Mangun Sumarso Wonogiri. Unnes J Public Heal. Published Online 2014. Doi:10.15294/Ujph.V3i4.3895.
Borchert, M., R. Varma, S. Cotter, K. TarczyHornoch, R, McKean-Cowdin, J. Lin, G. Wen, J. Wei, S. Azen, M. Torres, J.M. Tielsch, D.S. Friedman, M.X. Repka, J. Katz, L. Giordano, and J. Ibironke. 2011. Risk Factors for Hyperopia and Myopia in Preschool Children: The Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease and Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Studies. Ophthalmology 118 (10): 1966-73.
Karma L. Bhutia, Sonam C. Bhutia, N. Gupta, Diki O Shenga. Prevalence of Refractive Errors Among the School-going children in East Sikkim. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug; 69(8): 2018-2020. Published online 2021 Jul 26. Doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_112_21.
Daniel E. Jonas, Halle R. Amick, Ina F. Wallace, et al. 2017. Vision Screening in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Service Task Force. JAMA 318(9):845-858. Doi:10.1001/jama.2017.9900.
American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2013. Myopia. USA: EyeWiki. Available from: http://www.eyewiki.aao.org/Myopia.
Muhammad A. Dampak Gangguan Penglihatan Dan Penyakit Mata Terhadap Kualitas Hidup Terkait Penglihatan (Vision-Related Quality Of Life) Pada Populasi Gangguan Penglihatan Berat Dan Buta Di Indonesia. Published Online 2014.
World Health Organization. 2023. Blindness And Visual Impairment. (https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visualimpairment#:~:text=The%20International%20Classifi cation%20of%20Diseases,6%2F18%20to%206%2F 60).
Pérez Roche, M.T.; Yam, J.C.; Liu, H.; Gutiernez, D.; Pham, C.; Balasanyan, V.; García, G.; Cedillo Ley, M.; de Fernando, S.; Ortín, M.; et al. Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Preterm and Full-Term Children Using a Novel Digital Tes. Children 2023, 10, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010087.
Dian E.Y., Yulinda A.L., Julie D.B., Laura A.D., Lia A., Hartono G. Visual Acuity Assessment of Preschool Children in The Inner City Area in Jakarta. Paediatrica Indonesiana. Vol.62, No.1(2022).p.1-6
D. Ah-Kine Ng Poon Hing, J. J. Vaidhyan, A. Pathak, N. Quinn, L. Deng, S. Lyons, B. Moore. Comparison of Visual Acuity Measured With Lea Symbols and Lea Numbers at Different Test Distances. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):4852.
Cigi M. Paul, Sanitha Sathyan. Comparison of The Efficacy of Lea Symbol Chart and Sheridan Gardiner Chart for Preschool Vision Screening. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul; 66(7): 924-928.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 Ifada Hariani Kusuma, Rofa Husnul Khuluqi, Nanda Wahyu Anandita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.