RELATIONSHIP OF PUPIL SIZE WITH REFRACTIVE ERROR IN METABOLIC SYNDROME AND NON METABOLIC SYNDROME: AMONG RURAL POPULATION IN MALANG
Article Sidebar
-
Pupil, Pupil size, Pupillary abnormality, Refractive Eror, Myopia, Hyperopia, Astigmatism, metabolic syndome
Abstract
Introduction & Objectives
Nearly one in four Indonesians has metabolic syndrome (MS). One of the microvascular side effects
in Metabolic Syndrome affects the eyes. The aim of this study to evaluate the relationship of pupil
size with refractive error in MS and non-MS groups among rural populations in Malang.
Methods
A descriptive study was carried out in 2019 in three villages in Malang districts. A detailed ocular
examination was conducted on all participants who attended a research facility. We defined
pupillary abnormalities and clinically important refractive errors. Blood samples were obtained to
determine the parameter of the metabolic syndrome by IDF 2006 criteria. Subjects were classified
into 2 groups: Metabolic Syndrome status and non metabolic syndrome.
Results
953 participants completed the examination which consists of 944 right eyes and 942 left eyes. The
results of visual acuity on the right eye: emmetropia in 434 eyes, myopia with 252 eyes, hyperopia
with 141 eyes, and astigmatism with 17 eyes where if it is not significant if associated with pupillary
abnormalities (P-value 0.893). On the left eye, the emmetropia results were 444 eyes, while for
myopia were 244 eyes, hyperopia as many as 138, and astigmatism in 116 eyes and if associated
with pupillary abnormalities, the result also not significant (P-value 0.864). The result of pupil size
with metabolic syndrome 499 eye and non syndrome metabolic 454 eye are not significant (p-value
0.649).
Conclusion
Refractive error didn’t relate pupil size in metabolic syndrome and non metabolic syndrome.
Full text article
References
International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness. Roadmap of Visual Impairment Control Program in Indonesia 2017-2030. Jakarta; 2017.
Orr, Janis B., et al. Is pupil diameter influenced by refractive error?. Optometry and Vision Science, 2015, 92.7: 834-840.
Osaiyuwu B, Atuanya G.N., The relation between pupil size and refractive error. The Nigerian Journal of General Practice. 2014.12:2.
IDF (2006) The IDF consensus worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. http://www.idf.org/metabolic_syndrom e
Chopra R, Chander A, Jacob JJ. Ocular associations of metabolic syndrome. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16 Suppl 1(Suppl1):S6–S11. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.94244
Yarbagi A, Yazar H, Akdogan M, Pekgor A, Kaleli S. Refractive errors in patients with diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31(6):1481-4
Maqsood, Farah. Effects of varying light conditions and refractive error on pupil size. Cogent Medicine, 2017, 4.1: 1338824.
Telek, Hande Husniye, et al. The effects of age on pupil diameter at different light amplitudes. Beyoglu Eye J, 2018, 3.2: 80-85.
Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Age related changes in the charac- teristics of the near pupil response. Vision Res 2006;46:1393– 403.
Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Characteristics of pupil responses during far-to-near and near-to-far accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:328–39
Ferrari GL, Marques Jefferson LB, Gandhi RA, Celia EJ, Tesfaye S, et al. An Approach to the Assessment of Diabetic Neuropa- thy Based on Dynamic Pupillometry. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. Lyon, France Aug 22-26, 2007. Engi- neering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2007. p. 557–60
Smith SA. Pupil function: tests and disorders. In: Bannister R, Mathias CJ, editors. Autonomic Failure. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 393–412
Loewenfeld IE, Lowenstein O. The pupil: anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Ames: Iowa State University Press/ Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1993. p. 407-479, 498- 517, 1131-1187, 1200-1203.
Sevilla Y, Maldonado M, Shalom DE. Pupillary dynamics re- veal computational cost in sentence planning. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2014;67:1041–52.
Mesin L, Monaco A, Cattaneo R. Investigation of nonlinear pupil dynamics by recurrence quantification analysis. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:420509.
Bieniek MM, Frei LS, Rousselet GA. Early ERPs to faces: aging, luminance, and individual differences. Front Psychol 2013;4:268.
Bitsios P, Prettyman R, Szabadi E. Changes in autonomic function with age: a study of pupillary kinetics in healthy young and old people. Age Ageing 1996;25:4
Karavanaki et al. Pupil size in diabetes. 1994
Sercan et al. Assessment of Pupillary autonomic function by dynamic pupillometry in different circadian arterial blood pressure pattern.2018
Petra Baum et al. Dyfunction of autonomic Nervous system in childhood obesity. 2013.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 KURROTUL AINI, Anny Sulistyowati, Wino Vrieda Vierlia, Holipah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.