SCLERAL WOUND HEALING IN PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY : A NARRATIVE REVIEW

Nabita Aulia (1) , Habibah S. Muhiddin (2) , Budu (3) , Andi Muhammad Ichsan (4) , Hasnah Eka (5)
(1) a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:21:"Hasanuddin University";} , Indonesia
(2) Hasanuddin University , Indonesia
(3) Hasanuddin University , Indonesia
(4) , Indonesia
(5) Hasanuddin University , Indonesia

Abstract

Background: Scleral wound healing involves cell death, migration, proliferation, differentiation, and ECM remodeling. Damaged connective tissue and blood arteries produce extravasation of blood cells, platelets, and plasma proteins when incisions are made in the conjunctiva and sclera (e.g. fibronectin, fibrinogen and plasminogen).


Aims: This literature review aims to elaborate scleral wounds constructions in general, wound healing process, and closure of the scleral wound after pars plana vitrectomy.


Methods: This literature review conducted 35 research publications from 2013-2022 who cited from some reputable sources using “wound healing”, “scleral”, “sutureless”, and “vitrectomy” as keywords.


Results: The self-healing process that takes place after scleral wounds are closed. On the second day, fibrous tissue grows to fill in the wound gap, marking the beginning of the wound healing process. On the third day, the connective tissue was then expanded to span the entire thickness of the wound. On day five, the connective tissue begins to thicken and begins to align with the lamellae of the normal connective tissue that is around it. This process continues until day seven. On the seventh day, it looked that the wound had healed and normal tissue creation had taken place.


Conclusion: Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy accelerated scleral wound healing. Small trocars and Zorro incisions speed scleral healing. Otherwise, silicone oil didn't affect scleral wound healing.


 

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Williams L. Wilkins. Watson P. Duane’s Ophthalmology, Chapter 23: Disorder of the sclera and episclera. 2006

Newell FW. The Sclera. In: Ophthalmology Principles and Concepts. Fifth Edition. St.Louis Toronto London: The CV Mosby Company. 1982. 220-1

Waston PG, Hazleman BL, Pavesio CE, Green WR. Anatomical, phisiology and comparative aspect. In : the Sclera and Systemic Disorder. 2nd ed. Butterworth Heinemann : Edinburg, 2004 : 15-38

La Maza MS, Foster CS. Sclera. In Duane’s Clinical Ophtalmology on CD ROM. Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams&Wilkins : 2003 Eva PR. Sklera. Dalam:Vaughan DG, Asbury T, Riordan-Eva P, Suyono J,Editor. Oftalmologi Umum Edisi 14. Jakarta: EGC, 2000.169-73.

Fujii GY, de Juan E, Humayun MS, Pieramici DJ, Chang TS, Ng E, et al. A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(10).

Damasceno NA, Miguel NC, Ventura MP, Burnier M, Avila MP, Damasceno EF. Scleral wound healing with cross-link technique using riboflavin and ultraviolet a on rabbit eyes. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2017;11.

Arevalo JF, Berrocal MH, Arias JD, Banaee T. Minimally invasive vitreoretinal surgery is sutureless vitrectomy the future of vitreoretinal surgery? Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 2011;6(2).

Takashina H, Watanabe A, Mitooka K, Tsuneoka H. Factors influencing self-sealing of sclerotomy performed under gas tamponade in 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:2085-2089. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S67932

Warrier S, Jain R, Gilhotra J, Newland H. Sutureless vitrectomy. Vol. 56, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008.

T VB, S V de V, E V, L M, I S. Improving patient outcomes following glaucoma surgery: state of the art and future perspectives. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ). 2014;8. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S48745

Van de Velde S, Van Bergen T, Vandewalle E, Moons L, Stalmans I. Modulation of wound healing in glaucoma surgery. Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:319-340. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.05.002

Seibold LK, Sherwood MB, Kahook MY. Wound Modulation After Filtration Surgery. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2012;57(6):530-550. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.01.008

Orsted HL, Campbell KE, Keast DH, Coutts P, Sterling W. Chronic wound caring ... a long journey toward healing. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001;47(10):26-36.

Ziaei M, Greene C, Green CR. Wound healing in the eye: Therapeutic prospects. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2018;126:162-176. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.01.006

Keshavamurthy R, Venkatesh P, Garg S. Ultrasound biomicroscopy findings of 25 G Transconjuctival sutureless (TSV) and conventional (20G) pars plana sclerotomy in the same patient. BMC Ophthalmol. 2006;6(1):7. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-6-7

Avitabile T, Castiglione F, Bonfiglio V, Castiglione F. Transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge versus 20-gauge standard vitrectomy: correlation between corneal topography and ultrasound biomicroscopy measurements of sclerotomy sites. Cornea. 2010;29(1):19-25. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ab98ae

Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Hasegawa T, Ohnishi M, Sato T, Muraoka S. Wound healing of scleral self-sealing incision: a comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and histology findings. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236(10):775-778. doi:10.1007/s004170050157

Konichi da Silva NR, Tapias D, Bhisitkul RB. Evaluation of self-sealing scleral incision integrity in a fluorescein-perfused human cadaver eye model. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2017;58(8):2833.

Lakhanpal RR, Humayun MS, de Juan E, et al. Outcomes of 140 consecutive cases of 25-gauge transconjunctival surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(5):817-824. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.053.

Takashina H, Watanabe A, Mitooka K, Tsuneoka H. Factors influencing self-sealing of sclerotomy performed under gas tamponade in 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:2085-2089. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S67932

Byeon SH, Lew YJ, Kim M, Kwon OW. Wound leakage and hypotony after 25-gauge sutureless vitrectomy: factors affecting postoperative intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39(2):94-99. doi:10.3928/15428877-20080301-04

Lin AL, Ghate DA, Robertson ZM, O’Sullivan PS, May WL, Chen CJ. Factors affecting wound leakage in 23-gauge sutureless pars plana vitrectomy. Retina. 2011;31(6):1101-1108. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181ff0d77

Charles S. Vitrectomy techniques for complex retinal detachments. Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012;2(3):81-84. doi:10.1016/j.tjo.2012.06.002

Oliveira LB, Reis PAC. Silicone oil tamponade in 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Retina. 2007;27(8):1054-1058. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e318113235e

Hagemann LF, Kostamaa HJ, Jehan FS, Marques LEA, Kurtz R, Kuppermann B. How to Create an Immediate Self Sealing Sclerotomy for Cannula Placement in 25 Gauge Vitrectomy Using a Tunnel Incision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005;46(13):5463.

Friberg TR, Lace JW. A comparison of the elastic properties of human choroid and sclera. Exp Eye Res. 1988;47(3):429-436. doi:10.1016/0014-4835(88)90053-x

Curtin BJ, Iwamoto T, Renaldo DP. Normal and staphylomatous sclera of high myopia. An electron microscopic study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97(5):912-915. doi:10.1001/archopht.1979.01020010470017

Woo SJ, Park KH, Hwang JM, Kim JH, Yu YS, Chung H. Risk factors associated with sclerotomy leakage and postoperative hypotony after 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Retina. 2009;29(4):456-463. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e318195cb28

Siqueira RC, Gil ADC, Canamary F, Minari M, Jorge R. Pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade for acute endophthalmitis treatment. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(1):28-32. doi:10.1590/s0004-27492009000100006

Kim SH, Kim NR, Chin HS, Jung JW. Eckardt keratoprosthesis for combined pars plana vitrectomy and therapeutic keratoplasty in a patient with endophthalmitis and suppurative keratitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(3):474-477. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000098

Czajka MP, Byhr E, Olivestedt G, Olofsson EM. Endophthalmitis after small-gauge vitrectomy: a retrospective case series from Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(8):829-835. doi:10.1111/aos.13121

Nagpal M, Wartikar S, Nagpal K. COMPARISON OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND WOUND DYNAMICS OF SCLEROTOMY PORTS OF 20, 25, AND 23 GAUGE VITRECTOMY. Retina. 2009;29(2):225-231. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181934908

Inoue Y, Kadonosono K, Yamakawa T, et al. Surgically-induced inflammation with 20-, 23-, and 25-gauge vitrectomy systems: an experimental study. Retina. 2009;29(4):477-480. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31819a6004

Rizzo S, Genovesi-Ebert F, Agustin AJ. Small-Gauge Incision Techniques: The Art of Wound Construction - Retina Today. Accessed March 21, 2022. https://retinatoday.com/articles/2008-jan/0108_10-php

Authors

Nabita Aulia
aulia_nab@yahoo.com (Primary Contact)
Habibah S. Muhiddin
Budu
Andi Muhammad Ichsan
Hasnah Eka
Aulia, N., Budu, Andi Muhammad Ichsan, & Eka, H. (2023). SCLERAL WOUND HEALING IN PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY : A NARRATIVE REVIEW. Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.35749/journal.v49i1.100636

Article Details

How to Cite

Aulia, N., Budu, Andi Muhammad Ichsan, & Eka, H. (2023). SCLERAL WOUND HEALING IN PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY : A NARRATIVE REVIEW. Ophthalmologica Indonesiana, 49(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.35749/journal.v49i1.100636

SCLERAL WOUND HEALING IN PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY : A NARRATIVE REVIEW

Nabita Aulia, Habibah S. Muhiddin, Budu, Andi Muhammad Ichsan, Hasnah Eka
Abstract View : 0